- Home
- Editorial and Opinion
- How About Banning Cigarettes Altogether?
How About Banning Cigarettes Altogether?
- By Roy Douglas Malonson
- Published 09/28/2009
- Editorial and Opinion
-
Rating:




Roy Douglas Malonson
Roy D. Malonson is publisher of the African-American News&Issues.
View all articles by Roy Douglas Malonson
If you are a smoker, this won’t be a well-liked article. But unlike the preacher who makes you listen to him rant and rave for one hour before “coming to a close,” I’ll give you the end of my soliloquy now. I think it’s time to ban cigarettes altogether.
I had thrown a press release into the trash when I suffered a delayed reaction from something I read just a few minutes earlier. The headline which literally stopped me in my tracks stated: “Candy and Fruit Flavored Cigarettes Now Illegal in United States; Step is First Under New Tobacco Law.” It was enough to take my mind back to another case involving cigarettes that is currently in the news.
It seems that Rodney Morrison, a crack dealer from New York, left the game in 1993 to legitimize himself in the tax-free cigarettes industry. He opened a shop on an Indian Reservation and within 10 years, became one of New York’s biggest dealers in untaxed cigarettes. Two years ago, one in every seven packs sold in New York state came from either Morrison’s shop or three others on the reservation—all run by former drug dealers.
Morrison, a Black man, was convicted of illegally cigarette trafficking although the business, legally established on the reservation, at one point grossed $172 million in just under five years. But Morrison is just a bit player in an industry that in the first quarter of 2009, saw sales plunge by 19.3 percent. Yet, as recent as 2006, U.S. sales were estimated to be a staggering $49 billion.
Last week, when the ban on cigarettes containing certain characterizing flavors went into effect, it was authorized by the new Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, part of an effort by the Federal Drug Administration to reduce smoking in America. The release read, “The FDA’s ban on candy and fruit-flavored cigarettes highlights the importance of reducing the number of children who start to smoke, and who become addicted to dangerous tobacco products. FDA is also examining options for regulating both menthol cigarettes and flavored tobacco products other than cigarettes.”
The problem, which is unique to the tobacco industry is that they make a product which guarantees addiction of the end user, also almost guarantees death. And since the manufacturers have a “dying” pool of consumers, they have to try everything they can to entice new consumers. According to studies, 17-year- old smokers are three times as likely to use flavored cigarettes as compared to those over the age of 25.
“Flavored cigarettes attract and allure kids into lifetime addiction,” said U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Health Howard K. Koh, M.D., M.P.H. “The FDA’s ban on these cigarettes will break that cycle for the more than 3,600 young people who start smoking daily.”
That’s 1,314,000 new users every year. Before you say, they are only hurting themselves, you must realize that tobacco use accounts for one out of every seven Medicaid dollars spent by the States. “Reducing the number of smokers in the United States could save taxpayers billions of dollars in Medicaid costs,” said Justin Trogdon, Ph.D., an RTI International health economist in a 2007 report. “Policy makers looking for ways to reduce health care costs in America would be wise to look at areas of health behaviors that both improve health and reduce health care costs.” By the way, New York topped the list with its smokers costing Medicaid $1.5 billion each year.
Maybe it’s time that instead of just forcing the cigarette manufacturers to stop being cute, we should seriously consider shutting the industry down. After all, it is estimated by the American Cancer Society and World Lung Foundation, that by 2015, at least 2.1 million people will die each year because of tobacco-induced cancers. That’s 700 times the number of the people who died in the World Trade Centers on Sept. 11, 2001. Why aren’t people more concerned? Oh yeah, 9-11 cost us a few lives and some money. The tobacco industry cost us a lot of lives, but we make money.
I had thrown a press release into the trash when I suffered a delayed reaction from something I read just a few minutes earlier. The headline which literally stopped me in my tracks stated: “Candy and Fruit Flavored Cigarettes Now Illegal in United States; Step is First Under New Tobacco Law.” It was enough to take my mind back to another case involving cigarettes that is currently in the news.
It seems that Rodney Morrison, a crack dealer from New York, left the game in 1993 to legitimize himself in the tax-free cigarettes industry. He opened a shop on an Indian Reservation and within 10 years, became one of New York’s biggest dealers in untaxed cigarettes. Two years ago, one in every seven packs sold in New York state came from either Morrison’s shop or three others on the reservation—all run by former drug dealers.
Morrison, a Black man, was convicted of illegally cigarette trafficking although the business, legally established on the reservation, at one point grossed $172 million in just under five years. But Morrison is just a bit player in an industry that in the first quarter of 2009, saw sales plunge by 19.3 percent. Yet, as recent as 2006, U.S. sales were estimated to be a staggering $49 billion.
Last week, when the ban on cigarettes containing certain characterizing flavors went into effect, it was authorized by the new Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, part of an effort by the Federal Drug Administration to reduce smoking in America. The release read, “The FDA’s ban on candy and fruit-flavored cigarettes highlights the importance of reducing the number of children who start to smoke, and who become addicted to dangerous tobacco products. FDA is also examining options for regulating both menthol cigarettes and flavored tobacco products other than cigarettes.”
The problem, which is unique to the tobacco industry is that they make a product which guarantees addiction of the end user, also almost guarantees death. And since the manufacturers have a “dying” pool of consumers, they have to try everything they can to entice new consumers. According to studies, 17-year- old smokers are three times as likely to use flavored cigarettes as compared to those over the age of 25.
“Flavored cigarettes attract and allure kids into lifetime addiction,” said U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Health Howard K. Koh, M.D., M.P.H. “The FDA’s ban on these cigarettes will break that cycle for the more than 3,600 young people who start smoking daily.”
That’s 1,314,000 new users every year. Before you say, they are only hurting themselves, you must realize that tobacco use accounts for one out of every seven Medicaid dollars spent by the States. “Reducing the number of smokers in the United States could save taxpayers billions of dollars in Medicaid costs,” said Justin Trogdon, Ph.D., an RTI International health economist in a 2007 report. “Policy makers looking for ways to reduce health care costs in America would be wise to look at areas of health behaviors that both improve health and reduce health care costs.” By the way, New York topped the list with its smokers costing Medicaid $1.5 billion each year.
Maybe it’s time that instead of just forcing the cigarette manufacturers to stop being cute, we should seriously consider shutting the industry down. After all, it is estimated by the American Cancer Society and World Lung Foundation, that by 2015, at least 2.1 million people will die each year because of tobacco-induced cancers. That’s 700 times the number of the people who died in the World Trade Centers on Sept. 11, 2001. Why aren’t people more concerned? Oh yeah, 9-11 cost us a few lives and some money. The tobacco industry cost us a lot of lives, but we make money.
Spread The Word
2 Responses to "How About Banning Cigarettes Altogether?" 
|
said this on 24 Feb 2010 11:19:59 PM MST
Well, this is americal after all, we should have the right to do what we want. If i want to smoke and get lung cancer, i should be able to. Why arent they outlawing alchohol? It is also addictive, also causes death and health problems, but if you smoke a cigarette and get into a car, you dont drive into a tree. You have some drinks get into a car, you may very well drive into a tree or a person, or a car carrying a family. Tobacco helped build this nation, and part of being america is having the right to do what we want as individuals as long as it is within the confines of the law and does not hurt others, and having the right to chose what we believe is right and moral for oursleves. Banning cigarettes from resturaunts, and banning candy and fruit flavors, fine you can have that, even though none of the people i know ever started by smoking fruit flavors or cloves, only normal cigarettes that were easy to get, but you cannot outlaw it entirely and not realize how much of a breach of our rights as americans it is. It is not their job to choose what is right for our health, they are not our mom and dad, if we are old enough to smoke, then we should be able to. Cigarettes are not the only health issue in america. So what if my cigarettes might kill me, so will the alcohol you are drinking and the pesticides in your salad, and your stress level from working as a corporate cutthroat who takes away peoples jobs and outsources them to other countries. It is our job as an individual to care for our health, and if we dont care what smoking does to us, then neither should the government, it just isnt their say.
|
|
said this on 24 Feb 2010 11:24:07 PM MST
Oh and i forgot, the FDA always complains about all the chemicals in cigarettes, well they decided to make tobacco companies make Fire Safe Cigarettes, the companies had a plan that would work without using chemicals, but the FDA told them they had to do it on their terms. So now not only are we smoking all the chemicals you hear about on the commericals for anti-smoking campaigns, we are also smoking carpet glue, put there by the FDA themselves so really cant say anything about it.
|


Author/Admin)