|
WE MUST
UNDERSTAND
Is Pres.
Bush Black History Illiterate?
By Roy Douglas Malonson
|
 |
African
American News & Issues’
editorial staff aren’t holding their breaths
and waiting to exhale, when our detractors (that think we’re a bunch of
racists who find unique and
innovated ways to play the race card) finally
agree with us. Prejudiced deductions notwithstanding, our critics
apparently have become addictive to rejecting information that doesn’t
lineup with the information and data that’s disseminated by the
mainstream media. In addition, since most of the elitist Black faces in
high places depend on the mainstream media for their major source of
information, research data and statistics, there’s no way they will
agree that we do, indeed, try to report from a common sense, Black
perspective as objectively as we possibly can. But we really do.
We Must Understand, what is
referred to as a mindset is
defined in the dictionary as a noun that alludes
to "the beliefs that affect
somebody’s attitude - a set of beliefs or a way of thinking that
determine somebody’s behavior and outlook." If you set that
definition in your mind it shouldn’t be a problem
to understand why many African Americans have embraced the ideal that
slavery is in the distant past of the land of the free and descendants
of chattel slavery should forget their past and press toward the mark
with their eyes on the prize of
first class citizenship. In essence, that’s
exactly what Pres. George W. Bush told the captured audience at the July
20, 2006 NAACP Convention, when he mused: "I understand that racism
still lingers in America. It’s a lot easier to change a law than to
change a human heart.
"And I understand that many African-Americans
distrust my political party. I consider it a tragedy that the party of
Abraham Lincoln let go of its historical ties with the African-American
community. For too long, my party wrote off the African-American vote,
and many African-Americans wrote off the Republican Party." Apparently
Bush has the same mindset about Black America as he has about Iraq,
therefore he might truly believe that he can win the hearts and minds of
a people whom he has disrespected, simply because they have new
leadership. Should we equate Julian Bond to Saddam Hussein? For sure, he
sounded much like Iraq’s vanquished president when he was quoted to
say," The Republican Party
would have the American flag and the swastika flying side by
side," during his Feb.2, 2006 speech at Fayetteville
State University in North Carolina.
We Must Understand, true
history doesn’t lie, but Bush apparently doesn’t know "The Grand Old
Party’s" true history. He should know that "the party of Lincoln" was a
third party, which used freeing the slaves to lure free Black’s votes,
which made "Honest Abe," the
first U.S. president elected by a third party.
And, contrary to whitewashed history, Lincoln disrespected slaves. He
thought that Africans were inferior people who had no place in
mainstream America. Apparently Bush is Black History illiterate, or he
would know that we helped make the GOP. Especially in his home state (FYI:
The first ever state Republican convention
that met in Houston on July 4, 1867 was predominantly African American
in composition, with about 150 African American Texans attending, and 20
Anglos.
The second State GOP Chairman, Norris Wright Cuney,
an African-American from Galveston led the Republican Party from 1883 to
1897, it’s said by State historians held "the most important political
position given to a black man of the South in the nineteenth
century."-Republican Party of Texas.) Surely, the foregoing knowledge
should inspire the old homily, "If you fool me once, shame on you. If
you fool me twice shame on me," that our old folks often used when
somebody tried to run their weak game on them. Although the old folks in
the ‘hood had no idea that they were reciting an old Chinese proverb,
they definitely left no doubt
about where they were coming from. Furthermore, it
made no difference whether they were speaking to family, friend or foe,
because they said what they meant and meant what they said.
In other words, our elders tended to have long
memories. Race card aside, in spite of promises of a kinder, gentler
Republican Party, most Black History literate, political astute African
Americans said amen when Bond explained, "The passage of these two laws
in 1964 and 1965 marked the beginning of the dependence of the
Republican Party on the politics of racial division to win elections and
gain power. By playing the race card in election after election, they've
appealed to that dark underside of American culture, to that minority of
Americans who reject democracy and equality. They preach racial
neutrality and they practice racial division." Amen!
|