|
WE MUST
UNDERSTAND
In-justice must stop
where it starts
By Roy Douglas Malonson
|
 |
African
Americans raised by cultural literate elders often heard them say,
“That’s the straw that broke the camel’s back,” whenever enough was
enough. Like most old sayings, such truisms (That’s usually misquoted)
had historical and/or cultural significance that had nada to do with us.
First, however, African- AmericanNews&Issues must make sure that our
estimated 2 million readers--in five major Texas cities and well
populated surrounding towns, or the un-fathomable multitudes accessing
our colorful WebPages (www.aframnews.com), know exactly where we’re
coming from. For sure, we often misquote the idiom, “It was the last
straw that broke the camel’s back,” that surprisingly originated in
Great Britain.
In addition, the axiom translated to: “We can load the camel with lots
of straws, but finally it will be too much and the camel's back will
break. And it is only a single straw that breaks its back - the last
straw.” Nevertheless, all of the above is applicable when we’re
discussing our double-standard injustice system. An example is the mean
spirited “legal lynching” that Judge Betty Brock Bell endured. Need we
add that it wasn’t an isolated case, insofar as it’s a historical
problem that has bedeviled Africans in America, even before the first
slave ship docked in 1619 Jamestown, Virginia. In keeping with the
camel’s back analogy, there are plenty more straws waiting for us, as
long as brainwashed citizens see each straw of injustice as an isolated
case and/or fail to grasp the concept of a single straw breaking an
unwary camel’s back.
We Must Understand, the “Zombie” like grand juries (easily manipulated
by a District Attorney) becomes an analogous straw and unfortunate
citizens that become ensnared in a double-standard criminal justice
system represent the camel’s back. And if truth be told, double-standard
injustice isn’t just a Black thing. Bipartisan political games
notwithstanding, even powerful politicians (i.e., Tom Delay, or I. Lewis
“Scooter” Libby) aren’t exempt. On the other hand, the rich and powerful
can protect themselves, therefore we’re more concerned about 2005 Black
America. Sadly, we’re more impotent politically today than we were in
1965. Nevertheless, that’s a future article, because we’re obligated to
respond to one of our loyal readers here. We received an e-mail…signed,
Sincerely, JD Reyes, that questioned our Black perspectives.
Reyes wrote: “Greetings, I am sending this e-mail to let you know that
your newsletter is very informative and very disturbing. I mean if you
know (and do a good job) addressing the problem can you also spend more
time and paper space discussing the solution to this problem. It is one
thing to discuss the problem about what another ethnic group has done
and continues doing, (let us include Anglos in our discussion) because
just talking about it only fuels more racism and hate among minority
groups that I am part of. Dear Sir, I read your newspaper and felt a
disservice to our community with so much negative criticism. I would
like to have some feedback to my comments to know that someone is
listening.” We’re listening, and we hear what positive thinking citizens
of good consciences are saying.
We Must Understand, we’re miseducated to believe that logic can solve
illogical problems. Furthermore, an overwhelming consensus agrees with
Reyes. In addition, most citizens who’ve never been ensnared in
America’s double-standard criminal justice system are convinced that
criminals’ bad decisions are their biggest enemy. However, that’s the
way that our schools miseducate and indoctrinate our best and brightest
citizens (That’s further programmed by the mainstream media), to
rationalize a sin, sick, racist nation to be “the greatest.” So, please
perish the thought that we’re condemning a positive, idealistic citizen
for believing what they’ve been educated to believe. Conversely, they’re
fully aware that racism (i.e., hate, bigotry, discrimination, man’s
inhumanity to man), is illogical. Yet, they fail to connect the dots.
Cutting to the chase, one learns in kindergarten that a problem can’t be
solved without identifying its root. And, in Harris County, there’s
historical evidence that suggests that injustice starts in the District
Attorney’s office. Even so, can we really hold Chuck Rosenthal
acountable for the inequality that persists? You bet we can. We suspect
that Holmes, who passed the baton to Chuck, flinched when he tried to
criminalize Houston’s Police Chief. Yes, Bell made bad decisions.
Nevertheless, one is evil to destroy people, because they won’t dance to
their music? Consequently, an even bigger question is why did the voters
re-elect an alleged malevolent, vindictive, racist D. A.? After all,
injustice stops where it starts. At the polls. Meanwhile, let’s make
history by voting on Dec. 10. |