Is AIDS a plague
or a plan?
HIV linked to conspiracy to control Black population
|
Its been over three years, since Mayor Lee
P. Brown declared a state of emergency in 1999 Houstons African- American community
being consumed by the AIDS virus and a task force was created to combat the problem,
therefore African-American News&Issues was sure to be present at the City Hall Annex
Council Chamber, 900 Bagby, on Sept. 28. City officials held a press conference there to
provide an update on the HIV State of Emergency.
Ironically, Ada Edwards, who had been at the forefront to educate the Black community
about HIV, is now a City Council member of District D, wherein the emergency
exists, and she now chairs the HIV Task Force. Edwards hopes to conduct more testing and
information, but readily admits that naming and shaming the Black community is one thing,
while actually doing something to address the deadly problem is entirely another.
Nonetheless, for the first time, the city has designated $100,000 from the general fund to
prevent the spread of the disease.
Edwards, who also hosts a radio talk show on The Box (KBBX-97.9 FM), each Sunday morning
from 6-8 a.m., has often been at odds with AAN&Is Black perspective about AIDS,
inasmuch as it doesnt line up with the popular viewpoints about the dreaded virus.
AAN&I in fact, leans toward the conspiracy theory which asserts that AIDS is a
man-made malady to control non-White populations, therefore we would be remiss not to
share the following research that our articles inspired. To wit: Mr. African
Warrior, youve probably heard me call radio programs and talk about AIDS. If you
have, you know that the varieties of hosts, simply endure my rantings about conspiracies
against Black folks because its part of their job to do so.
I want to share some information that I have with you. These dots can be
connected. You might conclude that my argument is based on actual facts, circumstantial
facts. I only hope that my argument proves to be compelling. (1) In the 1920s-30s many
said to be eugenicists, like Prescott Bush and Margaret Sanger, advocated the reduction in
populations in people of color. They theorized that said people were inferior and a
hindrance to human progress (2). In 1969, Congress funded a request made by the Department
of Defense for 10 million dollars to research and develop the AIDS virus (2a) The 91st
Congress first session, HB 15090, chaired by George Herbert Walker Bush.
House Republican research committee task force on earth resources urged action on
the urgent need for population control activities to fend off the growing Third World
crisis-- #1 and #2 are citied in Emerging Viruses by Leonard Horowitz, pages
155 & 156, Governmental references pages 517-18. (3) Sometime within the 1978-80
period, I read an MIT newspaper in which it was written that research was being done on a
virus that attacked melanin. This was 4-5 years prior to any public information about
AIDS. Very little discussion resulted from the disclosure. There was very little concern
or public outcry, but there was some conversation about the research.
Sylvester Turner was at Howard University at the time, only one mile from MIT and he
might be familiar with the article (4). In 1983-84 there were many articles about AIDS in
Africa, Brazil, Haiti and pockets of the Black south. About a year later, most of the
information on AIDS was about the homosexual community. AIDS then became a homosexual
problem. I ask, were we duped into inaction? (5) In the early 1990s, several legitimate
researchers theorized that AIDS was a man-made disease. Most notably was Dr. Strecker, who
wrote numerous articles and made several videos in which he held seminars with researchers
in the medical field.
They concluded, beyond any doubt, that AIDS could not jump species and was man-made
(6) In 1996-97, Leonard Herowitz wrote a book in which he researched and found that AIDS
was paid for, researched and manufactured by the U.S. Government. He documents and gives
references about those government agencies involved in the effort. On Page 4, he states
that AIDS research requested by the U.S. government researched disease vulnerabilities of
people of color. I gave you the reference to George H. W. Bush on pages 155 & 156. I
ask the question: Can we connect the dots? Perhaps fear keeps us from connecting the dots.
Sincerely, Vincent Goodridge.
AAN&I acting on Goodridges suggestion (P. S. There is much more! Henry
Kissinger, etc.), excerpted the following (from African Foreign Policy and
Population Control): In 1969
(the) United States Defense Department requested
and got $10 million to make the AIDS virus in labs as a political/ethnic weapon to be used
mainly against Blacks. The feasibility program and labs were to have been completed by
1974-1975. The DOD requisitioned the $10 million from Congress to fund the development of
AIDS-like viruses. On July 29, 1969, the House Republican research committee task force on
earth resources and population, chaired by the Honorable George Bush of Texas, cited the
urgent need for population control activities to fend off a growing Third World
crisis.
As chilling as you are likely to find the information, AAN&I suggests that you read
Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola. Meanwhile, The Generation
Crisis, chapter from Before The Mayflower, is recalled. It suggested:
Some Whites said openly that the only solution to the Negro problem was
the Indian solution. An Indianian said, It would be better to kill them
off all at once, for there is no other way to get rid of them. He added: We
know what the Puritans did with the Indians, who were infinitely more magnanimous and less
imprudent than the colored race. Such then was the increasingly desperate situation
of Blacks as the walls of the White fifties closed in on them.
What stone, New York Blacks asked in 1860, has been left unturned
to degrade us? What hand has refused to fan the flame of popular prejudice against
us? Standing outside the pale of justice, enslaved in the South, despised in the
North, nineteenth-century Blacks tasted the dregs of bitterness. Why did they take it? The
answer is stunning in its simplicity: they believed in the real America, the one that was
dreamed and betrayed. Their forefathers, they said, had settled the land and manured
it with blood. The land was theirs, the country was theirsthey were willing to
fight for it. |